Frozen Conflicts, Georgian Politics, Romania, South Caucasus
The reaction of Western States: a preliminary assessment
Let’s have a quick look at international reactions to the conflict in Georgia. What we are interested in is how the West responded to Russia’s aggression in Georgia. As I am writing this, the conflict is still raging, so it is hard to extract myself from the events and provide a clear analysis. What follows is a short round-up of reactions, followed by brief comments:
- Eastern Europe and the Baltic states reacted strongly, condemning Russia’s aggression and pointing the finger at Moscow. Lithuania sent their FM, to Georgia Estonia is sending cyber attack specialists to help Georgia, entering the conflict in an interesting way [see article ]. In a courageous move, Ukraine warned that it would not allow Russian warships from returning to their base in Sevastopol.
- The US has gradually stepped up its rhetoric as the conflict escalated, warning Russia that its moves were disporportionate and threatening of a serious and long lasting cooldown of relations with Moscow. President Bush has come out strong to defend Georgia, but only in rhetoric.
- France, through the voice of President Nicolas Sarkozy, has shown true leadership inside the EU. Sarkozy reportedly had a tough exchange of words with Putin in Beijing, telling the Russian PM to retreat from Georgia. Paris sent in their FM into Georgia to mediate a peace agreement, which asked for Russian troops to retreat from S. Ossetia. As expected, the proposal was rejected by Russia. [see news ]
A few remarks. First, Eastern Europeans showed true courage and stood behind Georgia. A notable exception was Romania [the second largest country in the region, NATO and EU member, with significant military capabilities], who issued a bland statement more than 48 hours after the conflict outbreak.
Second, the US rhetoric is in line with its foreign policy line, but alas it cannot be matched by action. The State Department has made clear that the US will not intervene militarily in Georgia. This is due to its strong interests in Iran - the US has to make sure that Russia does not deliver S 300 missiles to Tehran, and cannot afford to make Moscow too upset. American interests in Iran supersede those in Georgia, and are compounded by worries of Russia’s ability to thwart US policies in other hot areas, most notably Afghanistan and Syria.
Third, and most importantly, France acted as a true European leader, taking a strong stance toward Russia. Witness to this is the recent announcement that President Sarkozy will visit Tbilisi tomorrow. From the point of view of EU diplomacy, it was lucky that the conflict erupted during the presidency of a large country like France.
More analysis will follow as the conflict unfolds.
11 Aug 2008 Skybar One
I too oppose the puerile response from this administration, but I wouldn’t say that France’s response is qualitatively better. I think the entire West, with the slight but notable exception of the Baltic countries, Poland, and the Ukraine, have turned a foreign policy disaster into the coming-out party for the West’s inevitable decline.
Well, perhaps not. But seen against the backdrop of inaction, indecision and divisiveness that has characterized EU foreign policy, it is nice to see that France is taking an active role in this, and sending the right signals to Moscow. I am curious, however, to see the EU statement after Wednesday’s session of the European Council. I should add perhaps that France’s strong support of Georgia is perhaps not entirely unrelated to the fact that it is virtually energy independent.
I firmly believe that France reaction was urged by Polish diplomacy, which from the beginning of the conflict is doing everything that’s possible to draw world attension to the situation:
http://www.president.pl/x.node?id=479
http://www.polskieradio.pl/zagranica/news/artykul88926.html
http://www.polskieradio.pl/zagranica/news/artykul88927.html
http://www.polskieradio.pl/zagranica/news/artykul88996.html
Milosz - I agree that Poland’s firm position set a good example for the EU. Congratulations for Poland! I wish had Romania had those balls. [Thanks for the links]
[...] you Milozs for the [...]
I suppose that many people did not believe that such events may occur - that’s why many international reactions were/are so slow. For Poland creating a buffer of independent countries between Poland and Russia is quite important. Additionally Georgia may be important transit route for strategic resources not going through Russian territory. Furthermore 50 yeras of Russian occupation of Polish territory are still alive in Poles memory, so anyone standing against Russia will probably win Poland sympathy. I suppose those were also important factor that formed Polish diplomacy response. And no matter how bad is my opinion of Polish president - I must give him the honor this time - he’s doing a very good job.
Thanks for a very insightful posts Alex.
I agree with you - the Duck did the right thing for once.
You are welcome, Milozs